Screener
MINO vs BOND
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINO costs 0.15% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than MINO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINO follows a index tracking strategy; BOND uses active selection.
- BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINO | BOND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $623M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 5.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.67% | 4.00% |
| Max drawdown | -15.24% | -19.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINO and BOND
Explore further