Screener
LFEQ vs EINC
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Energy Income ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 0.12% less per year.
- EINC is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while EINC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; EINC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $147M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +22.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 14.53% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -68.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and EINC
Explore further