Screener
LFEQ vs FFLS
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 1.02% less per year.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $42M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +0.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 8.88% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -11.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and FFLS
Explore further