Screener
LFEQ vs GTO
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.23% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while GTO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and GTO
Explore further