Screener
LFEQ vs HAP
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.17% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while HAP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; HAP uses index tracking.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $316M |
| Since | 2017 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and HAP
Explore further