Screener
LFEQ vs SMH
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.23% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SMH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SMH
Explore further