Screener
LFEQ vs SMHX
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMHX costs 0.23% less per year.
- SMHX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SMHX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SMHX uses index tracking.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SMHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $202M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +118.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 32.15% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -38.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SMHX
Explore further