Screener
LGOV vs KMAR
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- LGOV costs 0.30% less per year.
- LGOV is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGOV is classified as fixed income, while KMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LGOV follows a index tracking strategy; KMAR uses structured outcome.
- LGOV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGOV | KMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $664M | $35M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.21% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.03% | 9.38% |
| Max drawdown | -30.85% | -10.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGOV and KMAR
Explore further