Screener
LMBS vs KMAR
First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.13% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LMBS is classified as fixed income, while KMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; KMAR uses structured outcome.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LMBS | KMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $35M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.09% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.98% | 9.38% |
| Max drawdown | -6.48% | -10.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LMBS and KMAR
Explore further