Screener
LQDB vs CLOA
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- LQDB costs 0.05% less per year.
- CLOA is significantly larger than LQDB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LQDB follows a index tracking strategy; CLOA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQDB | CLOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | 5.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 2.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.15% | 0.72% |
| Max drawdown | -21.63% | -1.34% |
Similar to LQDB and CLOA
Explore further