Screener
LQDB vs BCLO
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- LQDB costs 0.30% less per year.
- LQDB follows a index tracking strategy; BCLO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQDB | BCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $74M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | 6.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.15% | 2.09% |
| Max drawdown | -21.63% | -4.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQDB and BCLO
Explore further