Screener
LRGF vs OMFL
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.21% less per year.
- LRGF is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LRGF follows a index enhanced strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGF | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.8% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -36.03% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRGF and OMFL
Explore further