Screener
LRNZ vs CHPX
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
Key differences
- CHPX costs 0.19% less per year.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; CHPX uses index tracking.
- LRNZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | CHPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $40M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.41% | — |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -15.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and CHPX
Explore further