Screener
LRNZ vs BAI
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
Key differences
- BAI costs 0.14% less per year.
- BAI is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ covers north america markets; BAI covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | BAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +98.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 32.44% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -34.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and BAI
Explore further