Screener
LRNZ vs BPAY
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs iShares FinTech Active ETF
Key differences
- BPAY costs 0.14% less per year.
- LRNZ is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ is classified as equity, while BPAY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LRNZ covers north america markets; BPAY covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | BPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $9M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 25.59% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -33.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and BPAY
Explore further