Skip to content
Screener

LSAT vs QVAL

LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

LSAT

LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$61M

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$530M

Key differences

Both LSAT and QVAL are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and QVAL 0.28%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; QVAL uses systematic alpha.

  • LSAT follows a active selection strategy; QVAL uses systematic alpha.
  • QVAL costs 0.71% less per year.
  • QVAL is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, QVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • QVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LSATQVAL
Annual cost (TER)0.99%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$61M$530M
Since20202014
Dividend yield1.73%1.46%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionsystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+11.6%+31.5%
CAGR 3Y+11.5%+20.7%
CAGR 5Y+6.1%+12.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.580.97
Volatility 1Y12.84%14.57%
Max drawdown-20.48%-51.49%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to LSAT and QVAL