Screener
MAGO vs AHYB
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs American Century Select High Yield ETF
Key differences
- AHYB costs 0.54% less per year.
- AHYB is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while AHYB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; AHYB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | AHYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $60M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -14.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and AHYB
Explore further