Screener
MAGO vs SDSI
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF
Key differences
- SDSI costs 0.67% less per year.
- SDSI is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while SDSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; SDSI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | SDSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $193M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.68% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -1.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and SDSI
Explore further