Screener
MAGO vs FUSI
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
Key differences
- FUSI costs 0.72% less per year.
- FUSI is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; FUSI uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | FUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $23M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.90% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -0.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and FUSI
Explore further