Screener
MAGO vs YYYM
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF
Key differences
- MAGO costs 1.79% less per year.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while YYYM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; YYYM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | YYYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 2.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $0.8M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -5.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and YYYM
Explore further