Screener
MATE vs AGOX
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
Both MATE and AGOX are alternative ETFs. MATE charges 0.97% a year and AGOX 1.33%. The main difference: MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- MATE costs 0.36% less per year.
- AGOX is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $387M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -27.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.