Screener
MATE vs XRLX
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- MATE costs 0.23% less per year.
- MATE is classified as alternative, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $51M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and XRLX
Explore further