Screener
MAVF vs TEQI
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- TEQI costs 0.21% less per year.
- TEQI is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | TEQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $403M |
| Since | 1996 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.0% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | 10.61% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -17.82% |
Similar to MAVF and TEQI
Explore further