Screener
MBB vs MTBA
iShares MBS ETF vs Simplify MBS ETF
Key differences
- MBB costs 0.11% less per year.
- MBB is significantly larger than MTBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBB is classified as fixed income, while MTBA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MBB follows a index tracking strategy; MTBA uses multi strategy.
- MBB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBB | MTBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38.3B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.23% | 5.53% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.54% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -17.65% | -3.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBB and MTBA
Explore further