Screener
MTBA vs CMBS
Simplify MBS ETF vs iShares CMBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.10% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than CMBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTBA is classified as alternative, while CMBS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MTBA follows a multi strategy strategy; CMBS uses index tracking.
- CMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTBA | CMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $481M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.53% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 3.64% |
| Max drawdown | -3.48% | -15.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTBA and CMBS
Explore further