Screener
MBCC vs FBCG
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- FBCG costs 0.57% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than MBCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBCC covers north america markets; FBCG covers global.
- MBCC follows a index tracking strategy; FBCG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBCC | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $170M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.8% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.14% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -30.62% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBCC and FBCG
Explore further