Screener
MBCC vs TCHP
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.57% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than MBCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBCC | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $170M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.8% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.14% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -30.62% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBCC and TCHP
Explore further