Screener
MCH vs MEMS
Matthews China Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF
Key differences
- MCH costs 0.10% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | MEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $22M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 20.96% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -22.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and MEMS
Explore further