Screener
MCH vs MCHS
Matthews China Active ETF vs Matthews China Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- MCH costs 0.10% less per year.
- MCH is significantly larger than MCHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $3M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +71.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 22.27% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -23.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and MCHS
Explore further