Screener
MCHS vs MEM
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- MEM costs 0.10% less per year.
- MEM is significantly larger than MCHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHS | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $53M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.2% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.27% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -23.75% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHS and MEM
Explore further