Screener
MCHS vs MEMX
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- MEMX costs 0.10% less per year.
- MEMX is significantly larger than MCHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHS | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $45M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.2% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.27% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -23.75% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHS and MEMX
Explore further