Screener
MDIV vs XNAV
Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- MDIV costs 0.56% less per year.
- MDIV is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MDIV is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MDIV follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MDIV | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $417M | $31M |
| Since | 2012 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 6.13% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.70% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -48.50% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MDIV and XNAV
Explore further