Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEAR vs BINC

iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

MEAR

iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$1.3B

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

Key differences

  • MEAR costs 0.14% less per year.
  • BINC is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEARBINC
Annual cost (TER)0.26%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$16.9B
Since20152023
Dividend yield2.87%5.60%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+3.3%+6.3%
CAGR 3Y+3.6%N/A
CAGR 5Y+2.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.02N/A
Volatility 1Y0.86%2.29%
Max drawdown-2.68%-2.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEAR and BINC