Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEM vs GEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$57M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both MEM and GEM are equity ETFs. MEM charges 0.79% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: MEM follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • MEM follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GEM costs 0.44% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than MEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$57M$1.7B
Since20222015
Dividend yield2.78%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+41.2%
CAGR 3Y+21.4%+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.941.00
Volatility 1Y21.64%20.62%
Max drawdown-19.10%-37.02%

Similar to MEM and GEM