Screener
MEM vs RNEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- MEM is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEM follows a active selection strategy; RNEM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEM | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $17M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.06% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.4% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.59% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEM and RNEM
Explore further