Screener
MEMA vs ASCI
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF
Key differences
- ASCI costs 0.15% less per year.
- ASCI is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEMA is classified as alternative, while ASCI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA covers emerging markets markets; ASCI covers global.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; ASCI uses active selection.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | ASCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $85M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -11.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMA and ASCI
Explore further