Screener
MEMA vs EMBX
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
MEMA is an alternative ETF, while EMBX is a fixed income ETF. MEMA charges 0.85% a year and EMBX 0.76%.
- MEMA is an alternative fund, while EMBX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- EMBX costs 0.09% less per year.
- EMBX is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $242M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.33% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -37.55% |
Similar to MEMA and EMBX
Explore further