Screener
MEMA vs EMBD
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
MEMA is an alternative ETF, while EMBD is a fixed income ETF. MEMA charges 0.85% a year and EMBD 0.39%.
- MEMA is an alternative fund, while EMBD is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- EMBD costs 0.46% less per year.
- EMBD is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $256M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.67% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -24.27% |
Similar to MEMA and EMBD
Explore further