Screener
MEMA vs FFLS
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
Both MEMA and FFLS are alternative ETFs. MEMA charges 0.85% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: MEMA covers emerging markets; FFLS covers North America.
- MEMA covers emerging markets; FFLS covers North America.
- MEMA costs 0.75% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $43M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | long short | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.33% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.