Screener
MEMA vs RLY
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
MEMA is an alternative ETF, while RLY is a fixed income ETF. MEMA charges 0.85% a year and RLY 0.50%.
- MEMA is an alternative fund, while RLY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; RLY uses active selection.
- RLY costs 0.35% less per year.
- RLY is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.35% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -34.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.