Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs ADVE

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

ADVE

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • MEMX is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXADVE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$9M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.72%2.60%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+62.2%+38.4%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.20N/A
Volatility 1Y21.07%16.71%
Max drawdown-19.27%-18.41%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and ADVE