Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs INDE

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Matthews India Active ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

INDE

Matthews India Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$13M

Key differences

  • MEMX is significantly larger than INDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXINDE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$13M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.72%1.95%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+62.2%-5.6%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.20N/A
Volatility 1Y21.07%16.42%
Max drawdown-19.27%-22.89%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and INDE