Screener
METD vs FAS
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF vs Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.14% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than METD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METD follows a inverse strategy; FAS uses leveraged.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METD | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 10.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.3% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +37.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.03% | 42.90% |
| Max drawdown | -46.03% | -85.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METD and FAS
Explore further