Screener
METL vs EART
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- EART costs 0.40% less per year.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; EART uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $43M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +112.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 37.89% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -53.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and EART
Explore further