Screener
METL vs REMX
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Key differences
- REMX costs 0.46% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; REMX uses index tracking.
- REMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +165.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 47.82% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -73.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and REMX
Explore further