Screener
METL vs REXC
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF
Key differences
- REXC costs 0.34% less per year.
- METL is significantly larger than REXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; REXC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | REXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -16.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and REXC
Explore further