Screener
REMX vs SETM
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- REMX costs 0.12% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- REMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMX | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $617M |
| Since | 2010 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +165.8% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.82% | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -73.34% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMX and SETM
Explore further