Screener
METL vs URNJ
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Key differences
- URNJ costs 0.19% less per year.
- URNJ is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; URNJ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $454M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +64.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 61.22% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -59.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and URNJ
Explore further