Screener
METL vs URNM
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- URNM costs 0.24% less per year.
- URNM is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; URNM uses index tracking.
- URNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +52.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 51.03% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and URNM
Explore further