Screener
METL vs XME
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.64% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; XME uses index tracking.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +106.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 34.35% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and XME
Explore further